<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ./code.geek.sh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://code.geek.sh/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://code.geek.sh</link>
	<description>Just another code geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 03:33:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The basics of ZFS ACLs by Raúl Valencia</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2009/07/the-basics-of-zfs-acls/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Raúl Valencia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 03:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=65#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Thanks dude. Your example helped me a lot on SunOS 5.11 (OpenIndiana). A note: on that version, the command  &quot;zfs set aclmode=passthrough /&quot; is no longer necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks dude. Your example helped me a lot on SunOS 5.11 (OpenIndiana). A note: on that version, the command  &#8220;zfs set aclmode=passthrough /&#8221; is no longer necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The basics of ZFS ACLs by Hayes Whitt</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2009/07/the-basics-of-zfs-acls/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayes Whitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=65#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Good post.  I refined the scripts a little.  You dont need to chmod 774 when you use owner@ group@ everybody@ with the A= command.
Check out my guide for Solaris 11 at hayeswhitt.com,
look under &quot;Permissions and ACL&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  I refined the scripts a little.  You dont need to chmod 774 when you use owner@ group@ everybody@ with the A= command.<br />
Check out my guide for Solaris 11 at hayeswhitt.com,<br />
look under &#8220;Permissions and ACL&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using ferm to build firewall rulesets by Tristan Seligmann</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2010/12/using-ferm-to-build-firewall-rulesets/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Seligmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=302#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Declarative is always better than imperative anyway :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Declarative is always better than imperative anyway :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using ferm to build firewall rulesets by Greg</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2010/12/using-ferm-to-build-firewall-rulesets/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=302#comment-235</guid>
		<description>It is quite declarative, but after using some other options (Firehol, Shorewall etc) I much prefer the terse nature of this format over those. Of course, PF still has the best format and configuration IMHO.

On the Linux note, well spotted. As soon as I finish up my BSD puppet modules and I no longer need to &quot;make install&quot; stuff, then I&#039;ll roll out some more BSD nodes ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is quite declarative, but after using some other options (Firehol, Shorewall etc) I much prefer the terse nature of this format over those. Of course, PF still has the best format and configuration IMHO.</p>
<p>On the Linux note, well spotted. As soon as I finish up my BSD puppet modules and I no longer need to &#8220;make install&#8221; stuff, then I&#8217;ll roll out some more BSD nodes ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using ferm to build firewall rulesets by Aragon</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2010/12/using-ferm-to-build-firewall-rulesets/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Aragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 01:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=302#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Mmm, this looks very declarative.  Firewall rulesets are pretty declarative too.  I think this might be more fun if it were imperative. :)

On a side note, is that a linux system I see? *while holding up a large BSD book*

:P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm, this looks very declarative.  Firewall rulesets are pretty declarative too.  I think this might be more fun if it were imperative. :)</p>
<p>On a side note, is that a linux system I see? *while holding up a large BSD book*</p>
<p>:P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using a ZFS filesystem with Time Machine by Greg</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2009/10/using-a-zfs-filesystem-with-time-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 03:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=154#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Hi Stuart,

No particular reason, I just find CIFS support to be quite good in OpenSolaris - it also natively ties into their ACLs.  Also, I have a number of other shares around for a few windows machines on the network.

I haven&#039;t tested NFS at all. OpenSolaris has pretty decent NFSv4 support, but I am not sure about the state of FreeBSDs NFS support. The last time I really used FreeBSD was around 6.x, before ZFS had even been ported across. 

Your NFS setup sounds like it&#039;s working fine though, so I&#039;d say go for it and follow steps 1,3-5 above (/Volumes/userbackups would obviously be your NFS mounted volume instead).

I&#039;d really appreciate it if you drop a comment here letting me know how it went!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stuart,</p>
<p>No particular reason, I just find CIFS support to be quite good in OpenSolaris &#8211; it also natively ties into their ACLs.  Also, I have a number of other shares around for a few windows machines on the network.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tested NFS at all. OpenSolaris has pretty decent NFSv4 support, but I am not sure about the state of FreeBSDs NFS support. The last time I really used FreeBSD was around 6.x, before ZFS had even been ported across. </p>
<p>Your NFS setup sounds like it&#8217;s working fine though, so I&#8217;d say go for it and follow steps 1,3-5 above (/Volumes/userbackups would obviously be your NFS mounted volume instead).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really appreciate it if you drop a comment here letting me know how it went!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using a ZFS filesystem with Time Machine by Stuart</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2009/10/using-a-zfs-filesystem-with-time-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=154#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

This is great. One question though, is there any reason to use cifs rather than nfs? I have nfs working sharing files between macs and freebsd zfs pool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>This is great. One question though, is there any reason to use cifs rather than nfs? I have nfs working sharing files between macs and freebsd zfs pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New addition to the family by Greg</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2009/09/new-addition-to-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=103#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no Apple hardware expert, but it looks like a really nice buy and has pretty decent specs. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digicape.co.za&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digicape&lt;/a&gt; are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digicape.co.za/storeview.php?product_id=59&amp;tem_id=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;advertising it&lt;/a&gt; at R19999 for the 3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo. Considering I paid just over R5k more for the MacBook Pro with a slightly slower processor, half the disk space and same amount of memory it seems like a great purchase. Of course you can&#039;t just sling it in a bag and take it off to work with you :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no Apple hardware expert, but it looks like a really nice buy and has pretty decent specs. <a href="http://www.digicape.co.za" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.digicape.co.za?referer=');">Digicape</a> are <a href="http://www.digicape.co.za/storeview.php?product_id=59&#038;tem_id=1" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.digicape.co.za/storeview.php?product_id=59_038_tem_id=1&amp;referer=');">advertising it</a> at R19999 for the 3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo. Considering I paid just over R5k more for the MacBook Pro with a slightly slower processor, half the disk space and same amount of memory it seems like a great purchase. Of course you can&#8217;t just sling it in a bag and take it off to work with you :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New addition to the family by MootPoint</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2009/09/new-addition-to-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>MootPoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=103#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Nice setup. I have been checking out the 27&quot; iMac i7. Having done some research on this stuff do you think it is worth the hefty price tag?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice setup. I have been checking out the 27&#8243; iMac i7. Having done some research on this stuff do you think it is worth the hefty price tag?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keyboard shortcuts in Google Wave by froztbyte</title>
		<link>http://code.geek.sh/2009/10/keyboard-shortcuts-in-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>froztbyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.geek.sh/?p=223#comment-24</guid>
		<description>The one problem I can see with some of these are the ctrl+ combos, since they&#039;re the same keys as used to jump to tab # in Firefox on Windows. Just as a gotcha for whoever might find that problem one day, and if they don&#039;t use Linux/OSX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one problem I can see with some of these are the ctrl+ combos, since they&#8217;re the same keys as used to jump to tab # in Firefox on Windows. Just as a gotcha for whoever might find that problem one day, and if they don&#8217;t use Linux/OSX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

